Moja mojstrovina in jo

I know what information I hold up to this day isn't quite enough to elaborately describe who you are as person but I'll give it a shot. I met you, no. I never have met you in person. Even if I feel like knowing you for years, we haven't know each other that much yet. It started me, getting a little bit bored, as you are too, started thinking of ways to amuse myself, and escape the constant pain brought by the vast world of reality. And so, I started putting of my interest; set it to "Pup" and started talking to a random stranger. A stranger who is in the same year as mine, a stranger who I share the same strand as well, also a stranger who holds the same pen as I do, but sways differently. Who writes on the same paper as I do, but with much more details and a bit more pieces of eraser and I knew it, that someday; masters of different arts will cross the roads and be able to write pieces of their own, and pieces to call their own, master pieces it may sound ...

Mr. Chair, this is to inform everyone that I would be starting this debate as an Iron man for the 1st speaker, 2nd speaker, 3rd and for the reply speech for no one really stayed by my side ever since, and I don't care if they will get a 67 speaker point, for not being here, they deserve less than that. So before preceding to my arguments let me first open this debate with my standards; Debating the motion of THR leaving the person you love despite of the non-reciprocating love affair and why side-government is more likely to win this debate in 3 standards. 1st is setting this debate in all countries because you can always find someone you love in any 3rd world country but still would not have the chance of being developed so why bother choosing? 2nd how this is more logical for, loving someone you love integrates you into a higher order of loving, on where you love someone because of commitment and not of reciprocation, how by loving someone with all your heart is a better regret...