Iron man love
Mr. Chair, this is to inform everyone that I would be starting this debate as an Iron man for the 1st speaker, 2nd speaker, 3rd and for the reply speech for no one really stayed by my side ever since, and I don't care if they will get a 67 speaker point, for not being here, they deserve less than that. So before preceding to my arguments let me first open this debate with my standards;
Debating the motion of THR leaving the person you love despite of the non-reciprocating love affair and why side-government is more likely to win this debate in 3 standards. 1st is setting this debate in all countries because you can always find someone you love in any 3rd world country but still would not have the chance of being developed so why bother choosing? 2nd how this is more logical for, loving someone you love integrates you into a higher order of loving, on where you love someone because of commitment and not of reciprocation, how by loving someone with all your heart is a better regret than loving someone halfheartedly when you'll end up losing them both at the end of the day. And last, how the value of love that we push for is much more better than hate, anger, jealousy, complications are able to help people to think, lead, guide and love one another radically and contribute more to society.
1st argument
Principle of Commitment
How commitment meaning to fully surrender your love, life, to someone urges a higher order of intimacy which leads to a more productive relationship and may last longer because commitment upholds the value of faith, which exercises the person's ability of loving, that the more you learn despite of getting hurt the more you love someone perfectly up until the last bell rings, the more you love harder, the better and will be able to find someone better that will be the perfect one for you.
2nd Argument
How we teach acceptance on side affirmative and how this is not mutually exclusive and why this is a value to begin with in the debate
Acceptance is a wholeheartedly decision with your mind, body and soul to fairly accept someone/something that is not meant for you and believing that there is something/someone destined for you, that if you lost her, she isn't to stay. It is also a decision that people that has great understanding towards loving can only comprehend, and those people are people who holds a higher level faith which we value on our side, which will never happen on the other house, why? Simple, the very reason of not staying for a person just because of she/he does not like you is a very sign of being unfaithful, and a value for a coward, for they don't like being hurt and the principle of Asha biyah is in play in which there are times you are up, then you are to go down, and when you are down there is no other way but up again. So feeling the pain in extreme will enable you to feast on the peak of the sweetest success. So never be afraid of doing something, because being afraid is a sign that you are to do something very courageous. Which are also values to help you in the long run.
How also continuos love, faith and commitment can stretch a person's ideology to greater understanding, toleration and integration to contribute to a better tomorrow.
And last argument
Is the Value of pain, you need it for extra motivation, give someone the love you have never received, love someone for you don't want them to experience the feeling of a regular sugar glazed donut, how despite of being so sweet you still feel empty inside, how you feel more of like water, that you always divide yourself unto smaller particles to fit on even the tiniest hole of a matter how me like free-flowing agent of weathering can be frozen because of too much coldness, how can too much hotness make me evaporate how can dirt transform me into a darker version but always firm, always gets back from zero, never loses hope, faith love and understanding, a resemblance of being so strong you flow again like never before.
And I don't care If my time is unprotected, I'll say this anyway, no matter how can a POI destroy my case, how weak my arguments are, how dumb my teammates are of not joining me here, how the adjcore still allowed me to debate, and I don't care if Mr. Chair I win, or lose this debate, I would never ever regret of loving someone just because of our relationship being so one-sided, I have loved her because of the million things she had done; like making me smile, caring for me, helping me answer all the POI's, rating the adj a seven when I told you to give him a two, you are always certain, even if your way to the designated room is always different, even if sometimes it takes us twenty minutes more than usual, I'd still follow you. I'd still debate with you, and in times that you aren't here with me, I will Iron man all the left speaker roles and fight for the values we have ever fought for, I'd debate for you.
Bring on the opposition side because Mr. Chair I have never ever been more proud to fight for her. Alone.
Debating the motion of THR leaving the person you love despite of the non-reciprocating love affair and why side-government is more likely to win this debate in 3 standards. 1st is setting this debate in all countries because you can always find someone you love in any 3rd world country but still would not have the chance of being developed so why bother choosing? 2nd how this is more logical for, loving someone you love integrates you into a higher order of loving, on where you love someone because of commitment and not of reciprocation, how by loving someone with all your heart is a better regret than loving someone halfheartedly when you'll end up losing them both at the end of the day. And last, how the value of love that we push for is much more better than hate, anger, jealousy, complications are able to help people to think, lead, guide and love one another radically and contribute more to society.
1st argument
Principle of Commitment
How commitment meaning to fully surrender your love, life, to someone urges a higher order of intimacy which leads to a more productive relationship and may last longer because commitment upholds the value of faith, which exercises the person's ability of loving, that the more you learn despite of getting hurt the more you love someone perfectly up until the last bell rings, the more you love harder, the better and will be able to find someone better that will be the perfect one for you.
2nd Argument
How we teach acceptance on side affirmative and how this is not mutually exclusive and why this is a value to begin with in the debate
Acceptance is a wholeheartedly decision with your mind, body and soul to fairly accept someone/something that is not meant for you and believing that there is something/someone destined for you, that if you lost her, she isn't to stay. It is also a decision that people that has great understanding towards loving can only comprehend, and those people are people who holds a higher level faith which we value on our side, which will never happen on the other house, why? Simple, the very reason of not staying for a person just because of she/he does not like you is a very sign of being unfaithful, and a value for a coward, for they don't like being hurt and the principle of Asha biyah is in play in which there are times you are up, then you are to go down, and when you are down there is no other way but up again. So feeling the pain in extreme will enable you to feast on the peak of the sweetest success. So never be afraid of doing something, because being afraid is a sign that you are to do something very courageous. Which are also values to help you in the long run.
How also continuos love, faith and commitment can stretch a person's ideology to greater understanding, toleration and integration to contribute to a better tomorrow.
And last argument
Is the Value of pain, you need it for extra motivation, give someone the love you have never received, love someone for you don't want them to experience the feeling of a regular sugar glazed donut, how despite of being so sweet you still feel empty inside, how you feel more of like water, that you always divide yourself unto smaller particles to fit on even the tiniest hole of a matter how me like free-flowing agent of weathering can be frozen because of too much coldness, how can too much hotness make me evaporate how can dirt transform me into a darker version but always firm, always gets back from zero, never loses hope, faith love and understanding, a resemblance of being so strong you flow again like never before.
And I don't care If my time is unprotected, I'll say this anyway, no matter how can a POI destroy my case, how weak my arguments are, how dumb my teammates are of not joining me here, how the adjcore still allowed me to debate, and I don't care if Mr. Chair I win, or lose this debate, I would never ever regret of loving someone just because of our relationship being so one-sided, I have loved her because of the million things she had done; like making me smile, caring for me, helping me answer all the POI's, rating the adj a seven when I told you to give him a two, you are always certain, even if your way to the designated room is always different, even if sometimes it takes us twenty minutes more than usual, I'd still follow you. I'd still debate with you, and in times that you aren't here with me, I will Iron man all the left speaker roles and fight for the values we have ever fought for, I'd debate for you.
Bring on the opposition side because Mr. Chair I have never ever been more proud to fight for her. Alone.
Comments
Post a Comment